I quote the AUP:
Disclosure
Residents are entitled to a reasonable level of privacy with regard to their Second Life experience. Sharing personal information about a fellow Resident --including gender, religion, age, marital status, race, sexual preference, and real-world location beyond what is provided by the Resident in the First Life page of their Resident profile is a violation of that Resident's privacy. Remotely monitoring conversations, posting conversation logs, or sharing conversation logs without consent are all prohibited in Second Life and on the Second Life Forums.
TOS 4.1 is the enforcement of these Community Standards.
Personally, I disclose my information on the 1st Life tab to protect others from this section of the Community Standards.
Others do that as well.
But others choose not to.
Maybe they are what they appear to be, maybe they aren't.
Reading through the New World Notes drama on the Male/Female avatar competition, Paisley appeared to cross the line on this.
I hope it's just my misreading the comment or it's just one of those "heat of the moment" things.
Of course, I could have been wiped from the grid and unpersoned fifty times over for Disruption, eh. Thank goodness I was finally made aware that some of my actions were being perceived as such so I could tone them down or, in other cases, eliminate them entirely. I am grateful to those who took the effort and opportunity to communicate instead of lash out with their own Disruptive behaviors, and we're all now living happily ever after.
So, folks, who out there on the grid do you nominate for my upcoming Middle Aged White Guy competition?
(I turn 39 next week, so in RL I am not eligible. However, I'm perfectly willing to construct a Middle Aged White Guy av to compete in this, eh.)
Someone quite brilliant and no-bullshit just asked me a question that renders all of this absurd:
"How many people competing in the Tiny Olympics are, in fact, tiny animals in RL?"
Bravo, my friend.
Haven't laughed that hard in weeks.